Search
Latest Blog Posts
-
November 17th, 2017 @ 9:17 am by Kevin
“Hellrazed?” is now available for purchase! -
February 5th, 2014 @ 8:28 am by Kevin
My new documentary is now available for purchase -
January 29th, 2014 @ 8:39 pm by Kevin
Here’s where you can watch my new documentary -
January 29th, 2014 @ 8:35 pm by Kevin
52-minute version of “Hellbound?” now available -
November 21st, 2013 @ 5:18 pm by Kevin
Black Friday DVD sale!
Categories
Archives
- November 2017
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
-
1August 29th, 2013 @ 6:27 pm by Kevin
After two amicable phone calls with the Dean and the Chair of the School of the Arts, Media and Culture, I’ve come to see my situation a bit more clearly.
Primarily, I’ve come to understand that the reason I have been barred from teaching at Trinity has to do with the fact that my “clarifying statement” re: article 10 of the university’s statement of faith went beyond simple clarification and into an outright contradiction of said article. At least that is how the university administration interpreted it. Therefore, the provost was unable to sign my contract b/c doing so would have set a precedent that essentially put any and all of their articles of faith up for grabs. In other words, it would have taken away Trinity’s ability to use their statement of faith as a means by which to maintain a distinct identity as a Christian educational institution. Therefore, while both the Dean and the Chair made it clear that I’m more than welcome on campus as a guest speaker, I am not allowed to become a faculty member, because then I would have an official role as a representative of the university, which would put them in a potentially awkward legal position.
In response, I would say that I affirm the administration’s right to maintain a distinct identity. However, I as I noted in a previous post today, I question the entire notion of using a statement of faith as an identity-formation mechanism. Not only does it make it appear like the institution is closed to ideas or individuals that threaten or contradict its presuppositions (which I don’t believe is actually the case at Trinity), it unnecessarily narrows the field of educational opportunities on offer to their students. Rather than using a set of beliefs as a prerequisite for participation in the community, I would advocate acquiescence to set of community goals and/or ideals that we strive to attain in journey together. Of course, that’s a much broader conversation, seeing as it essentially calls all forms of confessional Christianity into question, but I’m just throwing it out there for what it’s worth.
But it does seem to me that this is how Jesus recruited his followers. Rather than get them to assent to a statement of faith, he simply said, “Follow me,” and the beliefs came later. In fact, it seemed more like Jesus asked his followers to toss out everything they believed, or at least totally redefine it. My point being, the only prerequisite to join Christ’s community was a willingness to follow him.
Finally, I should say that people have expressed a lot of anger and outrage at Trinity’s decision, both on my Facebook pages and in emails to me personally. I’ve also had to deal with anger, frustration and disappointment over this issue on my own part. And while the temptation to castigate and scapegoat the “evil institution” is ever-present, I don’t think such feelings are warranted in this case. And they’re never a constructive way to respond in the long run anyway.
Instead, apart from a clear dispute over doctrine, what I think we have here was an old fashioned failure to communicate. I think the Trinity administration has learned a lot from this experience, and so have I. So I’m going to chalk this one up to experience and move on. No hard feelings.
leave a comment on this post (One Comment)
As a grad of the graduate program at TW I am saddened? angered? pissed? ya, that’s it, pissed. I am sorry to hear you will not be teaching your course. Trinity is one a dangerous course towards an institution that caters to certain teaching personalities. It’s unfortunate because there are good, intelligent, people in the faculty that welcome a variety of opinions of this subject and others. In other words, the heart of the university (the teachers) are the life blood that is being deprived of oxygen from the head. It’s depressing and hopefully will change.